Service Catalog

Protection Services, Evaluated With Clinical Rigor

Independent assessments across six protection disciplines — every recommendation backed by documented methodology and reproducible criteria.

What We Do

Personal Risk Assessment

Structured threat-modeling interviews combined with behavioral exposure mapping. Delivers prioritized vulnerability reports and mitigation pathways tailored to individual risk profiles.

Digital Privacy Hardening

Hands-on configuration of devices, accounts, and networks. We audit exposure surfaces, remove data brokers, and build repeatable hygiene protocols for ongoing protection.

Residential Security Review

On-site evaluation of perimeter, access, and surveillance systems. Includes lighting, landscaping, and procedural gaps that conventional installers routinely overlook.

Executive Protection Consulting

Discreet advisory for principals and family offices. Travel security planning, venue advance work, and protective intelligence briefings calibrated to threat tier.

Emergency Preparedness Planning

Family-scale continuity documentation covering evacuation, medical, communication, and supply contingencies. Stress-tested through tabletop exercises and annual review cycles.

Crisis Response Coordination

Standing advisory engagements with vetted legal, medical, and security professionals. Activation protocols reduce decision latency during acute incidents.

Why Choose Us

Documented Evaluation Criteria

Every recommendation traces back to a published scoring rubric. We publish our weights, thresholds, and exclusion criteria so reviewers can audit our conclusions directly.

Vendor Independence

Protectmefirst accepts no referral fees, sponsorship, or affiliate compensation. Our shortlists are constructed from performance data alone, never commercial arrangement.

Subject-Matter Review Panels

Each service category is reviewed by practitioners with active field experience. Panels rotate annually to prevent entrenchment and capture evolving best practice.

Reproducible Outcomes

Our methodology is designed so independent evaluators following the same steps reach comparable conclusions. We version-control our criteria and publish change logs.

How We Work

01

Scope Definition

Client intake establishes protection priorities, threat environment, budget envelope, and operational constraints. Outputs a formal engagement charter.

02

Data Collection

Site visits, document review, interviews, and instrumented testing where applicable. All findings timestamped and source-attributed for downstream audit.

03

Evaluation

Findings scored against published criteria. Comparative analysis identifies gaps, strengths, and candidate interventions within the engagement charter.

04

Recommendation

Final report ranks interventions by effectiveness, cost, and implementation friction. Includes monitoring plan and twelve-month reassessment trigger.

What People Say

Their methodology was the first we reviewed that actually documented how conclusions were reached. We could audit and trust each recommendation.
Dr. Helena Marsh — Director of Security, Mid-Atlantic University
Protectmefirst produced a protection plan our board approved in a single meeting. The evaluation framework made every trade-off legible to non-specialists.
Marcus Velazquez — General Counsel, Private Wealth Firm

Begin a documented protection engagement

Request a scoping conversation. We will outline evaluation scope, timeline, and deliverables before any commitment.

Request Scoping Call →